
WSJ – Daily Shot: Bitcoin 11/25/19

WSJ – Citi Research: Central Bank Net Asset Purchases – Ira Iosebashvili 11/24/19

Economist – Why WeWork doesn’t work yet – Daily Chart 9/17/19
Economist – Climate change could put insurance firms out of business 9/17/19
Insurance companies are uniquely exposed to these sorts (climate) of changes. Tens of millions of businesses buy policies every year to protect themselves from risks. As a result the industry is vast—last year the premiums paid for property and casualty insurance worldwide reached $2.4trn, according to Swiss Re, one of the big reinsurance firms on to which consumer-facing insurers pass the risk of mega-losses. Insurance companies spent $180bn on reinsurance premiums. Extreme events becoming the norm could force insurers to fork out ever greater payouts to policyholders, as well as lower the value of the assets they hold. The best case is that insurers reinvent themselves, helping the world cope—risk is, after all, how they make their money. The worst is that some fail and, more worryingly, that swathes of the global economy become uninsurable.
Already, insurers are seeing disasters of unprecedented scale. Earlier this month Hurricane Dorian, one of the two largest storms ever known to have made landfall in the Atlantic, battered the Bahamas and then the Carolinas. In July Hurricane Barry brought the heaviest rainfall ever measured to Arkansas. The Indian Ocean basin has seen three huge cyclones so far this year, one of which caused Mozambique’s severest flooding since 2000. Last November California saw wildfires over the largest area ever recorded.
Very costly disasters are becoming more frequent. Between 1980 and 2015 America saw an average of five events causing over $1bn in damage (in current prices) each year. Between 2016 and 2018 the yearly average was 15. In the 20th century, according to AIR Worldwide, a climate-modelling firm, a hurricane on the scale of Harvey, America’s costliest ever, would have been regarded as a one-in-2,000-year event. By 2017, when Harvey blew in, that frequency was estimated at one in 300 years. By 2100, says Peter Sousounis of AIR, it will be once a century, and tidal surges that used to be classed as once-a-millennium events will be expected to strike every 30 years.
Catastrophes are also getting harder to predict. Though newer models are starting to take account of climate change, most still rely on crunching numbers from the previous few decades, which are already obsolete. And insurers struggle to handle “compounding effects”—the mutually reinforcing impact on each other of events associated with global warming.
Adding to the losses is the growing number of properties being built in harm’s way, such as on flood plains and coasts. Average annual insured losses from catastrophic events have grown 20 times, adjusted for inflation, since the 1970s, to an average of $65bn this decade, with a peak of $143bn in 2017. That excludes knock-on effects such as business disruption. Last year the global figure totaled $85bn, the fourth-highest on record, even though it was a year without a mega-disaster.
Climate losses can also come from the other side of insurers’ balance-sheets: the investments they hold in order to cover potential payouts and park any spare funds. Insurers (including life as well as property and casualty) are the world’s second-largest institutional investors, with $25trn under management. They often place chunky bets on multinational firms, infrastructure and property—which are becoming riskier propositions as the climate changes. Moreover, structural changes in the economy, such as the move away from fossil fuels, could leave insurers’ portfolios exposed.
In the face of these threats, insurers are seeking to future-proof their businesses models. Part of this is about financial resilience. Most general policies are renewed annually, meaning firms can raise premiums promptly. And since a spate of mega-disasters caught them off-guard in the 1990s they have fortified their capital reserves. According to McKinsey, the policy holder surplus (crudely, the excess of assets over liabilities) available to pay claims in America’s property and casualty sector doubled in real terms over the last 20 years. In 1992 Hurricane Andrew sent 11 insurers to the wall. All survived the record hurricane season of 2017-18.
Regulators are doing more to prod insurers to hold sufficient capital—typically they aim to ensure they can withstand losses caused by the worst imaginable year in 200. But putting a figure on this is hard, because nobody has thousands of years of data. And the worst possible year is getting worse every year. The risks will keep rising long into the future, says Paul Fisher, a former supervisor at the Bank of England. A cataclysmic year could also hit markets, hurting insurers’ investments just when they need them most. Some could be forced to sell assets to cover giant payouts, pushing asset prices down further.
Most probably, payouts will continue to rise without capsizing insurers. But that still creates a problem. To absorb bigger losses, they must charge higher premiums. According to Marsh, a broker, global commercial-insurance prices rose by 6% in the second quarter of this year, compared with the previous quarter. That was the largest increase since records began. In America property rates jumped 10%; in the Pacific region they soared by nearly 18%. The rise is to meet the demands of reinsurers, which insure the insurers. Average reinsurance rates are set to rise by 5% next year, according to S&P Global, a rating agency—and in California, after the huge recent wildfires, by 30-70%.
A few calm quarters would probably see some of those increases unwound. But there is no doubt about the trend. And it cannot continue forever without causing at least some customers to rethink whether to buy insurance at all.
The global “protection gap” between total losses and insured losses is already wide and growing. The research arm of Swiss Re estimates that it more than doubled in real terms between 2000 and 2018, to $1.2trn. Half of last year’s losses from natural disasters were uninsured. Nine out of ten American homeowners have no flood insurance despite half of the population living near water, says Erwann Michel-Kerjan of McKinsey. The share of uninsured damage is especially high in developing countries, where infrastructure and risk-mitigation measures are not keeping pace with economic growth.
Where risks become uninsurable, states and firms may work hand-in-hand. In Britain, where a sixth of homes are at risk of flooding, government and insurers have set up Flood Re, a reinsurer of last resort that enables insurers to offer affordable premiums on 350,000 homes in flood plains. Every firm selling home insurance in the country pays into the scheme, spreading the costs across hundreds of thousands of policies. To avoid perverse incentives, houses built in high-risk areas after 2009 are excluded.
Developing countries are underinsured partly because the risks they face are poorly understood. And many are urbanizing fast, which means cities change from year to year, making the value at risk hard to track. More research would help deepen insurance markets, and making models publicly accessible would also enable officials and development financiers to evaluate mitigation measures. Above all, insurers need to take the lead in publicizing the growing risks posed by climate change, and the need for cover. According to Alison Martin of Zurich Insurance, often people do not take out insurance because they think the worst will not happen. Talking of one-in-2,000-year events is not very helpful, she says, “because many people would think we’re safe for another 1,999”.
A Wealth of Common Sense – The Best Free Investing Tools on the Web – Ben Carlson 6/25
Bloomberg – U.S. Housing Will Get Even Less Affordable – A. Gary Shilling 6/26
Bloomberg – The ‘Deep Fake’ Threat – The Editors 6/13
FT – Issues beyond Opec will drive oil prices in coming years – Nick Butler 6/24
WSJ – Has the Big Yuan Short Finally Arrived? – Nathaniel Taplin 6/26
Bloomberg Businessweek – The Modular-Home Maker That Could Make Housing Cheaper – Dina Bass 6/21
WSJ – Luxury Real Estate Comes to Urban Chinatowns – Katy McLaughlin 5/31
CNN – It’s true: Teens are ditching Facebook – Jordan Valinsky 5/31
WSJ – Comedies’ Misfortunes Are No Laughing Matter for Hollywood – Ben Fritz 6/25
Economist – Climate change is making the Arab world more miserable 5/31
FT – China’s carbon emissions set for fastest growth in 7 years – Lucy Hornby and Leslie Hook 5/29
WSJ – Daily Shot: CBOT Corn (Dec) Futures 6/25
WSJ – Daily Shot: CBOT Soybean Futures (Nov) 6/25
Economist – Russia’s role in shooting down an airliner becomes official 5/30
Economist – Weather and violence displace millions inside borders every year – The Data Team 5/22
Economist – Markets may be underpricing climate-related risk 5/23
FT – Tanking currencies are bad news all round – Jonathan Wheatley 5/22
WSJ – Daily Shot: Bianco Research – Google Search Trends – Consumer Spending 5/23
WSJ – Daily Shot: Bianco Research – Google Search Trends – Consumer Difficulties 5/23
CNBC – Inflation is coming to the US economy on an 18-wheel flatbed – Jeff Cox 5/22
FT – US has more than 5,600 banks. Consolidation is coming – Ben McLannahan 5/22
WSJ – Who Needs a Down Payment? Trade In Your Old Home Instead – Laura Kusisto 5/22
WSJ – Daily Shot: John Burns RE – Home Builder Land Acquisitions 5/23
FT – The geopolitics of electric cars will be messy – Henry Sanderson 5/22
FT Alphaville – ‘Some of the worst covenants that we’ve ever seen’ – Alexandra Scaggs 5/21
Axios – Next climate challenge: A/C demand expected to triple – Ben Geman 5/15
WSJ – Daily Shot: CME Lumber (Jul) Futures 5/22
FT – Malaysia says it has been ‘bailing out’ 1MDB – Alice Woodhouse and Harry Jacques 5/22
FT – Oil price rise puts heat on Narendra Modi’s government – Amy Kazmin 5/22
WSJ – Daily Shot: Black Market Exchange Rate – USD / Venezuelan Bolivar 5/23
CNBC – The richest person in every state, according to Forbes – Emmie Martin 5/22
Bloomberg – Middle-Class Doldrums Don’t Add Up to a Crisis – Noah Smith 5/9
FT – Investors should be cautious of simplistic indices – Kate Allen 5/9
WSJ – California Takes Big Step to Require Solar on New Homes – Erin Ailworth 5/9
FT – US oil producers battle to meet Iran shortfall – Ed Crooks 5/9
WSJ – Venezuela’s Brewing Oil Shock May Be Bigger Than Iran’s – Spencer Jakab 5/10
WSJ – Daily Shot: DISH Network Bond Price 5/19
Economist – Climate change will affect developing countries more than rich ones – The Data Team 5/9
WSJ – Daily Shot: FRED – PPI Concrete Products 5/10
Economist – Malaysia’s chance to clean up – Leaders 5/10
FT – China credit spreads near 2-year highs on default worries – Gabriel Wildau 5/9
“China credit spreads hit their widest level in nearly two years this week following new regulations that undermined long-held assumptions about implicit guarantees on debt linked to local governments.”
FT – Hong Kong’s tycoons: handing over power in troubled times – Ben Bland 5/9
Perspective
WSJ – Daily Shot: Houston is on some the nation’s least absorbent soil 8/29
Worthy Insights / Opinion Pieces / Advice
NYT – Harvey, the Storm That Humans Helped Cause – David Leonhardt 8/29
FT – A happier Japan is a concern for investors – Leo Lewis 8/28
FT – China’s tech groups are building too much power – Henny Sender 8/28
Markets / Economy
FT – US home ownership fall hits young and minorities hardest – Lauren Leatherby 8/28
Energy
WSJ – Harvey’s Lessons for America’s Stretched Energy Infrastructure – Spencer Jakab 8/28
Finance
FT – Wall St’s top bankers sell own groups’ shares as Trump rally reverses – Ben McLannahan 8/27
Environment / Science
FT – Blue dogs of Mumbai expose poor pollution controls – Simon Mundy 8/28
Economist – Louisiana fights the sea, and loses 8/26
Britain
WSJ – Daily Shot: Datastream – UK Household Savings Ratio 8/29
China
WSJ – Evergrande’s Ever More Risky Bet on Chinese Housing – Jacky Wong 8/28
FT – China orders videotaping of retail investment sales – Tom Mitchell 8/29
FT – Huarong chief warns of bubble in China’s distressed debt market – Don Weinland 8/28
India
Economist – Undue reverence for company founders harms Indian firms 8/26
The shipping world is about to change with the opening of new Panama Canal locks. U.S. shale reserves: now you see me, now you don’t.
Headlines
Briefs
Special Reports
Graphics
FT – Stocks under pressure as bond yields rise 6/10
FT – China spent $470bn to maintain confidence in renminbi – Gabriel Wildau and Tom Mitchell 6/12
Mauldin Economics – Hot Summer Economic Weirdness – John Mauldin 6/11
WSJ – German Benchmark Bond Yield Dips Below Zero 6/14
The Big Picture – Foreigners selling US equities at record pace – Torsten Slok 6/15
WSJ – China’s Suddenly Shrinking Corporate Bond Market 6/15
Visual Capitalist – The Shift to a Cashless Society is Snowballing – Jeff Desjardins 5/17
Bloomberg – China Dumping More Than Treasuries as U.S. Stocks Join Fire Sale 6/15
Featured
*Note: bold emphasis is mine, italic sections are from the articles.
Panama Canal, the Reboot. Alex Nussbaum, Naureen Malik, and Christopher Cannon. Bloomberg. 2 Jun. 2016.
“Nine years of construction work, at a cost of more than $5 billion, have equipped the Panama Canal with a third set of locks and deeper navigation channels, improvements that will double its capacity. When the new locks slide open for the first time in late June, the reverberations will be felt at Asian gas terminals, on Great Plains farms, and in ports from Long Beach, Calif., to Santiago, Chile.”
Why Billions in Proven Shale Oil Reserves Suddenly Became Unproven. Asjylyn Loder. Bloomberg. 14 Jun. 2016.
“Ultra Petroleum Corp. was a shale success story. A former penny stock that made the big leagues, it was worth almost $15 billion at its 2012 peak.”
“Then came the bust. Almost half of Ultra’s reserves were erased from its books this year. The company filed for bankruptcy on April 29 owing $3.9 billion.”
“Proven reserves – gas and oil resources that are among the best measure of a company’s ability to reward its shareholders and repay its debts – are disappearing across the shale patch. This year, 59 U.S. oil and gas companies deleted the equivalent of 9.2 billion barrels, more than 20% of their inventories, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. It’s by far the largest amount since 2009, when the Securities and Exchange Commission tweaked a rule to make it easier for producers to claim wells that wouldn’t be drilled for years.”
For reference, after the 2009 rule change “reserves surged 67%” in the following five years based on the 53 companies with records that far back. “Almost half the gains came from wells that existed only on paper.”
“Drillers face pressure to keep reserves growing. For many, the size of their credit line is tied to the measure.” Thing is that “there are two ways to increase reserves: buy more or find more. Fracking made it easier to do the latter, and the industry lobbied the SEC to count more undeveloped acreage as proved reserves…”
“The SEC agreed, with two key limits. First, the wells must be profitable to drill at a price set by an SEC formula. The companies got a temporary reprieve for 2014 because the SEC number was about $95 a barrel even though crude had plummeted to less than $50 by the time results were reported in early 2015.”
“That advantage has disappeared.”
“The SEC also requires that undeveloped wells be drilled within five years of being added to a company’s books.”
Other Interesting Articles
The Economist
Bloomberg – Earth’s Heat Extends Unprecedented Streak of Shattered Records 6/16
FT – Nigerian economy drops further into freefall 6/8
FT – Chinese tourists search far and wide for Japan’s rare whiskies 6/9
FT – The hedge fund fee structure consumes 80% of alpha 6/11
FT – Why hasn’t the productivity crisis caused a bear market (yet)? 6/12
FT – Tax rises on foreign homebuyers in Australia 6/13
FT – Japanese government bond yields fall to fresh lows 6/13
FT – MSCI A-shares denial sends Beijing clear message 6/15
FT – Gold is no safe port in this storm 6/15
FT – Uber points to profits in all developed markets 6/16
Herald News – Wood tower at the University of British Columbia a game-changer for construction 6/14
NYT – A Russian Cybersleuth Battles the ‘Dark Ages’ of the Internet 6/10
NYT – At the Birthplace of a Graft Scandal, Brazil’s Crisis Is on Full Display 6/10
NYT – The Overinflated Fear of Being Priced Out of Housing (Robert Shiller) 6/10
WSJ – These Chinese Developers Shed Property in Name Only 6/10
WSJ – China’s Banks: How Fixing Problems Can Make Them Worse 6/10
WSJ – China Economy: That Sputtering Sound Returns 6/13
WSJ – MSCI and China: Why There’s No Fear of Missing Out 6/15
Yahoo Finance – Real estate pros see recession by 2017, survey shows 6/16