Tag: Australia

April 10, 2017

If you were to read only one thing…

The US college debt bubble is becoming dangerous. Rana Foroohar. Financial Times. 9 Apr. 2017.

“Rapid run-ups in debt are the single biggest predictor of market trouble. So it is worth noting that over the past 10 years the amount of student loan debt in the US has grown by 170%, to a whopping $1.4tn — more than car loans, or credit card debt. Indeed, as an expert at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau recently pointed out to me, since 2008 we have basically swapped a housing debt bubble for a student loan bubble. No wonder NY Federal Reserve president Bill Dudley fretted last week that high levels of student debt and default are a ‘headwind to economic activity.'”

“In America, 44m people have student debt. Eight million of those borrowers are in default. That’s a default rate which is still higher than pre-crisis levels — unlike the default rate for mortgages, credit cards or even car loans.”

“Rising college education costs will not help shrink those numbers. While the headline consumer price index is 2.7%, between 2016 and 2017 published tuition and fee prices rose by 9% at four-year state institutions, and 13% at posher private colleges.”

“The average debt load individual graduates carry is up 70% over the past decade, to about $34,000.”

“Growing student debt has been linked to everything from decreased rates of first time home ownership, to higher rental prices, to lower purchases of white goods and all the things that people buy to fill homes. Indeed, given their debt loads, I wonder how much of the ‘rent not buy’ spending habits of Millennials are a matter of choice.”

“But there are even more worrisome links between high student debt loads and health issues like depression, and marital failures. The whole thing is compounded by the fact that a large chunk of those holding massive debt do not end up with degrees, having had to drop out from the stress of trying to study, work, and pay back massive loans at the same time. That means they will never even get the income boost that a college degree still provides — creating a snowball cycle of downward mobility in the country’s most vulnerable populations.”

“How did we get here?”

Essentially, “beleaguered governments are pushing more and more of the responsibility for the things that make a person middle class — education, healthcare and pension — on to individuals.”

“What are the fixes? For starters, we should look closely at the for-profit sector, where default rates are more than double those at average private colleges. These institutions receive federal subsidies but typically spend a minuscule part of their budgets on instruction; in the US, nearly 50% goes on marketing to new students. It looks all too much like an educational Ponzi scheme.”

“Transparency is also key — the student loan market as a whole is hopelessly opaque. In one recent US study, only a quarter of first year college students could predict their own debt load to within 10% of the correct amount.  Truth in lending documents would help, as would loan counselling paid for by colleges. Sadly, the agency that is leading the fight on both — the CFPB — is under attack from Trump himself.”

“But the administration will not be able to hide from the student debt bubble. In an eerie echo of the housing crisis, debt is already flowing out of the private sector, and into the public. Before 2007, most student loans were underwritten by banks or other private sector financial institutions. Today, 90% of new loans originate with the Department of Education. Socialization of risk continues to be the way America deals with its debt bubbles. “

“Would that we considered making college free, as Bernie Sanders suggested. Even Mr. Dudley called this ‘a reasonable conversation.’ That way we could socialize the benefits of education too.”

More perspective: NYT – Loans ‘Designed to Fail’: States Say Navient Preyed on Students – Stacy Cowley and Jessica Silver-Greenberg 4/9

Worthy Insights / Opinion Pieces / Advice

NYT – The Gig Economy’s False Promise – The Editorial Board 4/10

  • “In reality, there is no utopia at companies like Uber, Lyft, Instacart and Handy, whose workers are often manipulated into working long hours for low wages while continually chasing the next ride or task. These companies have discovered they can harness advances in software and behavioral sciences to old-fashioned worker exploitation, according to a growing body of evidence, because employees lack the basic protections of American Law.”

WSJ – Should the Social Security Trust Fund Be Allowed to Invest in Stocks? – Alicia Munnell (Boston College) and Michael Tanner (Cato Institute) 4/9

  • In the argument for and against, “what the two sides generally do agree on is that the Social Security trust fund needs shoring up: According to a trustees’ report from last year, the fund is on track to run dry around the mid-2030s, at which point the program would be able to pay out only about 75% of promised benefits.”

Atlantic – What in the World Is Causing the Retail Meltdown of 2017? – Derek Thompson 4/10

  • “Finally, a brief prediction. One of the mistakes people make when thinking about the future is to think that they are watching the final act of the play. Mobile shopping might be the most transformative force in retail—today. But self-driving cars could change retail as much as smartphones.”
  • “Once autonomous vehicles are cheap, safe, and plentiful, retail and logistics companies could buy up millions, seeing that cars can be stores and streets are the ultimate real estate. In fact, self-driving cars could make shopping space nearly obsolete in some areas. CVS could have hundreds of self-driving minivans stocked with merchandise roving the suburbs all day and night, ready to be summoned to somebody’s home by smartphone. A new luxury-watch brand in 2025 might not spring for an Upper East Side storefront, but maybe its autonomous showroom vehicle could circle the neighborhood, waiting to be summoned to the doorstep of a tony apartment building. Autonomous retail will create new conveniences and traffic headaches, require new regulations, and inspire new business strategies that could take even more businesses out of commercial real estate. The future of retail could be even weirder yet.”

Markets / Economy

FT – Gundlach: appetite for reflation trade will wane further – Eric Platt 4/10

  • “Jeff Gundlach (chief executive of DoubleLine Capital – which manages $105bn on behalf of its clients), the influential bond investor, has warned that appetite for the so-called relation trade will evaporate further in coming months as expectations for an acceleration in US economic growth and inflation are tempered.”
  • Not all that surprising really, and if you’re in the market for a mortgage there should be some relief in pricing (there already has been so far this year).  Then the article goes on to say: “the yield on the 10-year Treasury bond will not be back up to 3% this year, a level he had previously said would spell the end of the bull market. DoubleLine’s founder told investors he believed it would head higher over a longer period and could reach 6% in four or five years.”
  • Come again… please elaborate. No really, the article doesn’t elaborate or link to any reports by Gundlach. Talk about burying the lead.
  • Consider the implications on home pricing if 10-year rates are at 6%. They’re currently at around 4.10% on a 30-year fixed, so about 260bp (basis points) or 2.6% points higher than 10-year rates which are around 2.4%. To translate, if you have a $400,000 mortgage (arbitrary number) you’d be looking at a monthly payment of $1,932.79 at today’s rate.  That same mortgage amount if 30-year fixed rate mortgages hold a similar spread when the 10-year treasury is at 6% would be $3,104.05. A 60.60% increase in the monthly mortgage amount or $14,055.12 additional after tax dollars each year. Or if you could only afford the $1,932.79 monthly payment, then you would only be able to take on a $249,067 mortgage. Presumably that would hurt your purchasing power.
  • Alternatively, consider commercial real estate. If the 10-year moved to 6% in four or five years, what should you be putting in your models for an exit cap rate? Currently the commercial property loans average about 150bp over the 10-year for the primary categories-office, retail, multifamily, and industrial-according to interest rate surveys from Trepp.  Hence, you can buy a going-in cap rate of 5% and have a little spread of 1.10% (110bp) over the cost of your debt.  Fortunately for the last 30 or so years you could model a lower exit cap rate – really accounting for a large part of many investors returns.  Consider if you had to add 350bp to your exit cap rate…
  • Again to translate. Today the idea of purchasing a property that generates $100,000 in triple net (NNN) income-net of all expenses, property taxes, etc.-at a 5% cap rate would imply that you’d be willing to pay $2,000,000 for the property. Okay. What happens if cap rates adjust to maintain a similar spread over the 10-year treasury if it moves to 6%?  Then for the same income you’d want a 8.6% cap or would be willing to pay $1,162,791.  A 41.86% drop in value.
  • Well, the counter argument would be that the economy would have to be cranking along pretty well for the 10-year Treasury rate to move to 6%.  Then some of the effects of the above would be neutralized by increasing incomes, increases in spending, and so on.  However, note that rent from tenants are contracted and increase in defined amounts – so in this case, they’d probably get the better of the landlords – unless there are generous percentage rent terms…
  • Don’t expect this to be a smooth transition, and real estate is not the only industry that relies on a lot of debt capital – think energy…

 

 

Bloomberg – There’s a Big Reason Volatility Might Be Coming Back – Alex Harris 4/8

WSJ – Nothing to Fear but the Lack of Fear in Markets – Steven Russolillo 4/9

Energy

FT – Energy shifts to a buyers’ market – Nick Butler 4/9

  • “Markets have a tendency to swing from side to side. There are times when suppliers can name their prices and times when the advantage is against them. We are the cusp of a major change after half a century of producer control. For the companies involved and their investors this is a hard moment. Some will see it as a cyclical move that will be reversed as demand increases. That is a very risky investment strategy. The better approach for both companies and investors is to assume that we are experiencing a structural shift and that to thrive those involved in the sector must adapt their business model and their investment strategy to a new reality.”

Australia

Rational Radical – Housing bubble is now official, commence arse-covering (panic)! – Matt Ellis 4/7

China

FT – China markets regulator: ‘iron cockerels’ to be dealt with harshly – Hudson Lockett and Jennifer Hughes 4/9

 

FT – HNA’s buying spree surpasses $40bn with CWT deal – Don Weinland, Arash Massoudi, and James Fontanella-Khan 4/9

  • “China’s HNA Group, the small domestic airline operator turned ultra-acquisitive conglomerate, has now struck more than $40bn of deals in little more than two years after announcing plans to buy Singapore logistics provider CWT.”
  • “However, the activity has confounded veteran bankers and China watchers alike, who have raised concerns over its rapid expansion and also questioned its sources of capital for the deals, many of which are done through affiliates. Moreover, the pace of HNA’s foreign dealmaking has quickened in spite of a Chinese clampdown on the flow of capital out of the country since November.”

March 31 – April 6, 2017

Increases in 401(k) leakage do not bode well for US retirements. Australian house price bubble. The hard facts about coal.

Headlines

NYT – Venezuela Muzzles Legislature, Moving Closer to One-Man Rule 3/30. It’s been a few decades since a Latin American country has regressed into a dictatorship.

Bloomberg – Venezuelan Top Court Reverses Shock Ruling on Congress Authority 4/1. Well then they reversed the ruling “… after the nation’s top prosecutor, a Maduro ally, labeled the Supreme Court’s March 29 move unconstitutional.” There may be hope for Venezuela yet.

Reuters – Venezuela money supply up 200 percent in year, fastest rise on record 4/3. When coupled with declining output of goods and service, it means inflation – for “contrast, the United States’ money supply was up 6.4% in the same period.”

NYT – Within Hours, Plans for a Quiet Corner of China Send Home Prices Soaring 4/3. And just like that the county of Xiongxian was anointed. 

FT – Businesses stirred by new Indian alcohol curbs 4/3. The Supreme Court in India just banned alcohol sales within 500m of a national highway causing a vast number of business establishments (hotels, restaurants, bars, etc.) to reel.

FT – Xi’s crackdown on corruption is a boon to corporate China 4/3. The corruption crackdown is working and companies are finding that they are having to set aside less to cover the vig.

Special Reports / Opinion Pieces

Briefs

  • Yuan Yang and Xinning Liu the Financial Times highlighted Didi Chuxing’s existential crisis in China.
    • “Didi Chuxing may have defeated Uber, but China’s dominant ride-hailing platform is no match for the country’s local governments after being forced to gut its urban fleet to comply with regulations.”
    • “Didi is the world’s fourth-biggest private tech group with a $34bn valuation last September. It has raised more than $10bn from investors including Apple, who invested $1bn in the company last year.”
    • But… there is the issue of recent regulation from Beijing and Shanghai: “local cars, local drivers.”  Issue is that the majority of Didi’s drivers and especially the vast majority of its low paid drivers were migrants.
    • We’ve seen the model. Didi and Uber rely on marginalizing it’s drivers or losing its investor’s money, hence the push for autonomous cars to reduce its labor costs.
    • As the company put it “because our transportation capacity has been reduced recently, there may be some impact…on the chances of successfully hailing a ride and on waiting times, which Didi apologizes for.”
    • “Shaun Rein of China Market Research Group said: ‘The new measures have a serious impact on Didi’s business. It threatens their ability to grow because it’s hard to find drivers.'”
    • Hence, “in February Didi announced it was moving into high-end car-hailing services, a consequence of losing its pricing advantage against taxis.”
    • “Analysts say that the company has no choice but to go upmarket and look for other sources of growth.”
    • And of course, they have to be mindful that other cities are likely to implement similar regulations.
    • “Didi’s new direction is also likely to bring it into closer co-operation with the traditional taxi companies it once competed with, and even take it back to its roots as a taxi-hiring platform.”
  • The team at the Economist covered the global shortage in one commodity that most rarely think of – sand.
    • “India’s ‘sand mafia’ is doing a roaring trade. The Times of India estimates that the illicit market for sand is worth around 150bn rupees ($2.3bn) a year; at one site in Tamil Nadu alone, 50,000 lorryloads [truck loads] are mined every day and smuggled to nearby states. Gangs around the country frequently turn to violence as they vie to continue cashing in on a building boom.”
    • “Most of the modern global economy depends on sand. Most of it pours into the construction industry, where it is used to make concrete and asphalt. A smaller quantity of fine-grade sand is used to produce glass and electronics, and, particularly in America, to extract oil from shale in the fracking industry. No wonder, then, that sand and gravel are the most extracted materials in the world. A 2014 report by the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) estimates they account for up to 85% by weight of everything mined globally each year.”
    • “…Of the 13.7bn tons of sand mined worldwide for construction last year, 70% was used in Asia. Half was used in China alone, where the government estimates that it built 32.3m houses and 4.5m km (2.8m miles) of road between 2011 and 2015.”
    • “Sand often makes up the very ground that is built on, too. By virtue of dumping vast quantities of sand into the sea, Singapore is now over 20% larger than it was when it became independent in 1965.”
    • Thing is “sand may appear plentiful, but is in fact become scarce. Not all types are useful: desert sand is too fine for most commercial purposes (Qatar is a big importer and the Burj Khalifa skyscraper in Dubai was built using Australian imports). Reserves also need to be located near construction sites; as transportation costs are high compared with the price…”
    • “Substitutes for sand do exist. Mud can be used for reclamation, straw and wood to build houses, and crushed rock to make concrete. Asphalt and concrete can be recycled. Production processes will shift towards these alternatives as the price of sand rises…”
    • Further, select countries are seeking to do their part. “Reduced demand from Singapore might discourage illegal mining in nearby countries. Rising prices will eventually force developing-country builders to explore alternatives to sand. But without better law enforcement, high sand prices also make illicit mining more lucrative. Despite the damaging consequences, the sand mafia will continue raking it in for a while.”

Graphics

WSJ – Daily Shot: Employment in video-tape and DVD rental stores 3/30

Pew Research – Key findings about Puerto Rico – Jens Manuel Krogstad, Kelsey Jo Starr and Aleksandra Sandstrom 3/29

WSJ – Fed Sees Car Trouble Down South – Aaron Back 3/30

FT – Low oil price and currency controls hit Nigeria hard – Siona Jenkins 3/31

WSJ – Daily Shot: FRED – Loans and Leases, All Commercial Banks 4/2

Slowing credit growth in the U.S.

WSJ – Daily Shot: FRED – Commercial and Industrial Loans 4/2

WSJ – Daily Shot: FRED – Consumer Loans – Other and Automobile Loans 4/2

WSJ – Daily Shot: FRED – Real Estate Loans, All Commercial Banks 4/2

WSJ – Daily Shot: Vox – US Opioid Usage 4/2

WSJ – Daily Shot: Vox – US Opioid Prescription per capita 4/2

Visual Capitalist – How Much State Debt Rests on Your Shoulders? – Jeff Desjardins 4/3

WSJ – Daily Shot: John Burns Real Estate Consulting – US Annual Medical Costs 4/3

WSJ – Daily Shot: NY Fed – US Consumer Debt 4/3

WSJ – Daily Shot: NY Fed – US Consumer Debt by Age of Borrower 4/3

WSJ – Daily Shot: China Credit Boom 4/3

Featured

*Note: bold emphasis is mine, italic sections are from the articles.

The Rising Retirement Perils of 401(k) ‘Leakage.’ Anne Tergesen. The Wall Street Journal. 2 Apr. 2017.

“American companies are trying to stop employees from raiding their 401(k)s, in an attempt to ensure that older workers can afford to retire and make room for younger, less-expensive hires.”

“Tapping or pocketing retirement funds early, known in the industry as leakage, threatens to reduce the wealth in U.S. retirement accounts by about 25% when the lost annual savings are compounded over 30 years, according to an analysis by economists at Boston College’s Center for Retirement Research.”

“‘Employers have done a lot to encourage people to save in 401(k) plans, such as automatically enrolling them. But there is a growing recognition that if the money isn’t staying in the system, the objective of helping employees reach their retirement goals isn’t being met,’ says Lori Lucas, defined-contribution practice leader at investment-consulting firm Callan Associates Inc.”

“Employees who grew accustomed to borrowing from their 401(k)s during the recession are tempted by the rising balances in these types of plans, which currently hold $7 trillion, up from $4.2 trillion in 2009, experts say.”

Further, when employees change jobs there is the temptation not to rollover their 401(k) balances.

“On average, about 30% to 40% of people leaving jobs to elect to cash out their accounts and pay taxes and often penalties rather than leave the money or transfer it to another tax-advantaged retirement plan, according to recordkeepers and economists.”

“Most plans also allow people to pull out their savings-after paying taxes and typically a penalty-for reasons including buying a home, preventing foreclosure, and paying medical bills and college expenses, something relatively few participants do annually. These are known as hardship distributions and the employee must demonstrate an ‘immediate and heavy financial need,’ according to the Internal Revenue Service.”

“Employees can also generally choose to borrow up to half of their 401(k) balance or $50,000, whichever is less, without having to state a reason. According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, a nonprofit research group, 87% of participants are in plans that let them take 401(k) loans.”

“About a fifth of 401(k) participants with access to 401(k) loans take them, according to the Investment Company Institute, a mutual-fund industry trade group. While most 401(k) borrowers repay themselves with interest, about 10% default on about $5 billion a year, says Olivia Mitchell, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.”

“‘4019(k) plan leakage amounts to a worryingly large sum of money that threatens to undermine retirement security,’ says Jake Spiegel, senior research analyst at research firm Morningstar Inc. His calculations show that employees pulled $68 billion from their 401(k) accounts taking loans and cashing out when changing jobs in 2013, up from $36 billion they withdrew in 2004.”

Fears of bubble as Australian house prices surge. Jamie Smyth. Financial Times. 2 Apr. 2017.

“Australia’s house prices are rising at their fastest pace in seven years, igniting fears of an emerging property bubble and prompting regulators to crack down on risky bank lending.”

“New figures on Monday show residential property prices have increased 12.9% in the past 12 months, with prices in Sydney surging 18.9% – the fastest rate of growth in almost 15 years.”

“House prices in Sydney have more than doubled since the financial crisis hit in January 2009 while prices in Melbourne are up 92.4%. This has occurred despite sluggish consumer price inflation, tepid rates of business investment and economic growth.”

“Surging house prices are a concern for global regulators as they seek to prevent the asset price bubbles in an ear of ultra-low interest rates ushered in by the financial crisis in 2008. Regulators in Australia, Ireland, New Zealand and a host of other countries have introduced macroprudential rules in a bid to slow house price inflation.”

“In 2014 Australian regulators placed a 10% limit on growth in new lending to investors, a move that initially slowed bank lending to the buy-to-let sector. But a recent increase in lending to investors prompted regulators on Friday to issue new rules limiting the flow of ‘interest only’ mortgage lending by banks to 30% of new loans issued.”

“About 40% of new mortgages are issued on ‘interest only’ terms, under which borrowers do not have to pay back the principal of the loan for a specific period.”

“The regulator also placed limits on the volume of ‘interest only’ lending at loan-to-value ratios above 80% and flagged closer scrutiny of lending at loan-to-value ratios above 90%.”

More importantly, economists are pointing to the Australian tax system that needs some reform. Specifically “Australia’s system of ‘negative gearing’ provides investors with a tax break allowing them to claim as losses the financing and other costs of their rental properties against other income. The tax break has become so popular that 15% of the electorate have become buy-to-let investors.”

“Investor loans make up just over one-third of the A$1.49tn (US$1.13tn) residential property market, according to Australia’s prudential regulator.”

Reminds of me of the U.S. tax system before the Tax Reform Act of 1986 – when professionals of all sorts would invest in real estate simply for the sake of the tax write-off. If the property made money or went up, all the better. Easy to see how valuations can become disconnected from their fundamentals.
Alternative truths and some hard facts about coal. Nick Butler. Financial Times. 2 Apr. 2017.

The facts:

  • “The share of electricity production in the UK accounted for by coal fell to just 3.5% in the third quarter of 2016.”
  • “Worldwide, the number of new coal-fired power stations starting construction fell by over 60% in 2016.”
  • “Over-supply has pushed thermal coal prices down to half the level reached in 2010.”

At the same time

  • “Some 42,000MW of new coal-fired generating capacity was brought on stream in China last year and Beijing announced that coal consumption was set to rise by 19% over the next five years, despite rapid growth in the use of renewable sources.”
  • “In spite of extensive subsidies for renewables, 40% of electricity in Germany last year came from coal, leading to an increase in carbon emissions in 2016.”
  • “Across the world 50% of aluminum, 70% of steel and 40% of electricity are produced from coal.”

In the UK, regulation is systematically phasing out coal energy.  In Germany, there is enough political support from the Social Democratic party to keep coal use going.

“In the US, the main threat to coal is not environmental regulation but price competition from low-cost natural gas. Coal is the principal victim of the shale gas revolution and the revival of the shale industry will intensify that competitive challenge over the next decade.”

“China is the world’s largest user of coal (burning more than 50% of the global total) and is pursuing a serious policy of encouraging renewables and setting a ceiling on coal demand growth.”

“The biggest challenge and the most important factor in the global coal market is India.” While the country is serious about renewable energy initiatives, the country wants economic growth.  “The problem is that to grow, it needs the cheapest possible form of power on a large scale and for the moment that is coal. Nuclear, solar and wind will all contribute but coal is the pre-eminent source of supply and Indian imports will shape the world market.”

“Coal is plentiful and cheap and will be made cheaper still if US producers, under pressure from gas in their domestic market, export more.”

“Until the new sources of energy supply can beat the current low prices coal will remain the leading source of heat and power and will meet something like a third of the world’s energy needs. The proportion burnt in high efficiency, low emission plants will rise but that will remain a fraction of the total for the foreseeable future, not least because coal users cannot afford the upgrades necessary. Coal is the energy source of choice, through necessity, of the poorer half of the world.”

“Times may be tough for the industry, and the continued use of coal in sub-critical technology may be bad for the environment, but like it or not coal is not in free fall.”

Other Interesting Articles

Bloomberg Businessweek

The Economist

 

A Wealth of Common Sense – The Dependability of Cycles 4/2

Bloomberg – People Are Paying to Work From Bars and Restaurants 4/3

FT – Active investing: a new hope 3/31

FT – Fed may start normalizing balance sheet later this year, Dudley says 3/31

FT – China’s Hollywood war chest threatened by poor ticket sales 4/1

FT – China cracks down on ‘financial ants’ smuggling cash to Hong Kong 4/1

FT – China’s Huishan tapped shadow banks as condition worsened 4/2

FT – China’s ‘bad banks’ thrive as alternative lenders 4/3

FT – Casino bosses will bet big to open Japan’s gaming industry 4/4

FT – Huishan saga exposes China’s tycoon finance risk 4/4

FT – Venezuelan bond sell-off accelerates as $2bn payment looms 4/4

FT – Cambodia scraps US military aid deal in latest snub to Washington 4/5

FT – Shanghai-listed shares have best day since August 4/5

FT – Middle Eastern oil producers still have strong hand 4/5

FT – Information asymmetry bedevils the oil market 4/5

MarketWatch – Americans are taking out the largest mortgages on record 4/5

NYT – Sears and Its Hedge Fund Owner, in Slow Decline Together 3/30

NYT – Stores Take Flight From Fifth Avenue in Manhattan 4/4

WP – The troubles at the American mall are coming to a boil 4/5

WSJ – Fed Sees Car Trouble Down South 3/30

WSJ – Why Americans Aren’t Spending Like They Used To 3/31

WSJ – If You Have 29 Credit Cards, You’re Probably a Millennial 3/31

WSJ – Buying a Home This Spring Will Be Hardest in Years 4/1

WSJ – Trouble Bubbling Under at Chinese Banks 4/3

WSJ – Why ECB’s Negative-Rate Policy Is Out of Order 4/3

WSJ – This Volatility Warning Has a Different Ring to It Today 4/3

WSJ – Macau Gambles on the High Rollers 4/3

WSJ – Economy Will Miss That New-Car Smell 4/4

September 30 – October 6, 2016

Xi Jinping, the master politician. In the US oil and gas industry it’s about time for some more culling of the herd. Uber providing transportation solutions for US municipalities.

Headlines

Briefs

    • “Saudi Arabia has cut public sector bonuses and benefits for the first time since the collapse in oil prices, in a move that underlines the depth of the fiscal crisis facing the kingdom.”
    • “The new rules, which come into force next month, apply to all public sector workers, both Saudis and expats, as well as the military (except soldiers serving in Yemen).”
    • “If you were a white kid who went to work straight out of high school around 1975, you earned roughly $44,000 two decades later. BY 2014, on average, your pay had fallen to $32,000 a stunning 27% decline in real terms, after accounting for inflation.”
    • “College grads are doing okay. Across all age groups, income in this group rose from $77,209 in 1996 to $94,601 in 2014, a 22.5% increase. A college-educated worker who was 28 in 1996 and 46 in 2014 enjoyed a whopping 132.8% spike in pay. The only losers among college grads were those were those 57 or older in 2014. Their pay fell from somewhere between 13% and 28.5% between 1996 and 2014, but still leveled out at $83,000 or higher in 2014, well above the national average.”
    • Yahoo Finance_Wage and salary income chart_10-5-16
  • In a Financial Times guest correspondence piece, Steven Major (head of fixed-income research at HSBC) discussed why there is no game-changer that will end the bond bull market.
    • I’m going to keep this one real brief by just listing the major points.
    • “Backdrop favors a low real natural rate of interest”
    • “Deleveraging across public and private sectors has not started”
    • “Central banks continue to amass huge balance sheets”
    • “Connectivity between markets is increasing”
    • “We realize that all this makes pretty grim reading for those hoping for an improvement in the growth outlook and a return to ‘normal,’ whatever that is. But this is part of the problem. There is no shortage of hope that something will turn up and there is excessive vested interest in the higher yield view. Too much money is chasing too little return.”
  • The Financial Times Confidential Research division produced a report on how underground loans in China are defeating attempts to cool the housing market.
    • “Analysis by FT Confidential Research suggests that underground lenders have become an important source of funding for Chinese consumers struggling to make down payments on home purchases as real estate prices surge. Such lending may hamper attempts to cool down overheating top-tier housing markets.”
    • FT_Consumer loans from underground lenders in China_10-5-16
    • “Despite concerns at the central level about housing bubbles, the property market’s rising tide is lifting other economic boats, FTCR data show. Our proprietary surveys found positive sentiment in the freight sector and construction labor market, the indices for both of which hit 2016 highs, while households have not been in such good cheer for nearly two years.”
    • FT_Average house prices in Shanghai and Shenzhen_10-5-16
    • “Consumers appear to be responding to the wealth effect generated by rising house prices. Our monthly measure of consumer sentiment rose to its highest level since October 2014. Survey respondents reported strong improvements in their household financial situations, discretionary spending and views on the economy. Furthermore, the forward-looking components of our suite of monthly data suggest momentum is set to carry through to the end of 2016.”

Special Reports / Opinion Pieces

Graphics

FT – Global economic growth ‘sliding back into the morass’ – Chris Giles 10/2

FT_Overall growth index_10-2-16

WSJ – A New Worry for Banks and the Economy – Aaron Back 10/3

wsj_growth-in-us-commercial-and-industrial-loans_10-3-16

Visual Capitalist – Black Swans: 9 Recent Events That Changed Finance Forever – Jeff Desjardins 10/5

Visual Capitalist_Black Swans_10-5-16

WSJ – Some Big U.S. Cities See Apartment Rents Fall for First Time in Years – Laura Kusisto 10/4

WSJ_Rental rates cooling off_10-4-16

FT – Perth’s slide highlights Australia commodity bust – Jamie Smyth 10/4

FT_Australian House price changes_10-4-16

FT – World debt hits $152tn record, says IMF – Claire Jones 10/5

FT_Global gross debt_10-5-16

Featured

*Note: bold emphasis is mine, italic sections are from the articles.

Xi Jinping May Delay Picking China’s Next Leader, Stoking Speculation. Chris Buckley. New York Times. 4 Oct. 2016.

“The Chinese president, Xi Jinping, appears prepared to defy the Communist Party’s established script for transferring power and delay the designation of his successor until after a party congress next year, unsettling the party elite and stirring speculation that he wants to prolong his tenure.”

“The delay would buy Mr. Xi more time to promote and test favored candidates and prevent his influence from ebbing away to a leader-in-waiting, experts and political insiders said. But the price could be years of friction while a pack of aspiring cadres vie for the top job, as well as unnerving uncertainty over whether Mr. Xi wants to stay in power beyond the usual two terms as party leader.”

“The drama will probably begin in earnest this month, when the Central Committee, about 200 senior officials who sign off on major decisions, meets in Beijing. That meeting is likely to set in motion plans for the congress, which will meet in late 2017 to endorse a new top lineup.”

“While it is a given that the congress will back Mr. Xi for another five-year term as party leader, nearly everything else is up for grabs, giving Mr. Xi great sway to shape the new leadership.”

“Five of the seven members of the powerful Politburo Standing Committee must step down because of age, assuming the informal retirement age of 68 holds. That leaves only Mr. Xi, 63, and Mr. Li, 61, to return.”

US oil and gas pipeline industry ripe for consolidation. Ed Crooks. Financial Times. 4 Oct. 2016.

“Tim Schneider, analyst at Evercore ISI, argues that the North American pipeline industry is on the verge of a wave of consolidation like the one that swept through the large integrated oil companies in the late 1990s and early 2000s.”

“The US has about 140 Master Limited Partnerships: a tax-advantaged structure available to energy infrastructure businesses that is typically used by midstream operators. Mr. Schneider argues that only about half of those have a ‘right’ to exists. Many will have to sell themselves, dispose of assets to stay alive, or ‘simply disappear’, he says.”

FT_North American pipeline M&A_10-4-16

“In 2014, there were 9,679 miles of crude oil pipeline completed in the US, according to IHS Markit, the research group. In 2017, it expects 4,175 miles of large projects to be completed, assuming Dakota Access (the contested 1,172 mile pipeline from the shale oilfields of North Dakota to Patoka, Illinois) goes ahead.”

FT_US crude oil pipeline additions_10-4-16

“Many MLPs, and some of the pipeline companies that are structured as regular corporations, have business models that depend on perpetual growth justifying continuing cash inflows.”

“Energy Transfer Partners, for example, in the first half of this year distributed $1.8bn to investors and spent $3.5bn on capital investment, but generated cash from operations of just $1.4bn. The numbers were made to add up by selling the Sunoco retail business to its affiliate Sunoco LP for $2.2bn, and by issuing units worth $1.1bn.”

In regard to the MLP industry, Tim Schneider put it this way “they are like cattle feeding at a trough. The weaker ones are going to get shoved aside.”

Uber offers subsidized rides in drive to solve US parking crisis. Leslie Hook. Financial Times. 5 Oct. 2016.

“In a first-of-its-kind of deal for Uber, Summit (New Jersey) has hired the company to provide free rides for commuters to and from its train station, starting this week. For the local authority, the six-month pilot helps solve its downtown parking crisis; for Uber, the deal is one it hopes to replicate across the country.”

“These transit deals could potentially give Uber access to a new revenue source, from transportation authorities, and access to new passengers. Just as importantly, Uber sees them as a means towards its ultimate goal: a world where shared autonomous cars are a primary mode of transportation and private vehicle ownership is no longer necessary.”

“The Summit deal focuses on what is known as the ‘last mile’ problem of getting commuters to and from rail stations, which researchers consider to be an ideal use case for ride-sharing.”

“Facing budget pressures, US cities are increasingly experimenting to see whether hiring Uber, or its smaller rival Lyft, can be a cheaper alternative to building parking garages or adding bus routes.”

“Last month, Boston announced a test program that subsidizes Uber and Lyft rides for disabled passengers, a faster option compared with the city’s door-to-door van service. Earlier this year, a county in Florida started providing free Uber rides at night for low-income passengers – a cheaper alternative to a night bus. Another city in Florida pays for all its residents to have discounted Uber rides, and Washington DC is even considering using Uber to help respond to non-emergency 911 calls.”

“In Summitt, Mayor Nora Radest said the city contacted Uber a year ago to talk about a deal because it was looking for an economical way to address its downtown parking shortage. Hiring Ubers for its commuters will cost about $167,000 a year, the city estimates, while building a parking garage would have cost more than $15m.”

“We are looking at this not as a transportation solution but as a parking solution. The goal is to get those 100 cars that sit in the commuter station all day, and get them out of there.” – Mayor Radest

Other Interesting Articles

Bloomberg Businessweek

The Economist

A Wealth of Common Sense – How Things Have Changed on Wall Street in the Last 50 Years 10/5

FT – Traditional banking is on borrowed time – so why invest? 9/29

FT – Yet more low but stable global economic growth is unsustainable (Mohamed El-Erain) 9/29

FT – China entertainment: Wanda-lust 9/30

FT – Mongolia request IMF loan 9/30

FT – Deutsche reawakens systemic fears amid talk of ‘Lehman moment’ 10/3

FT – IMF lowers growth forecast for US and other advanced economies 10/4

FT – Markets eye the taper but fear the tantrum 10/5

FT – Swiss suspect Ponzi scheme used to conceal 1MDB losses 10/5

FT – US banks roll out callable bonds to meet Fed debt rules 10/5

NYT – Developer That “Cracked the Code’ on Modular Building Exits the Business 10/5

NYT – Oil Glut? Here Comes Some More! 10/5