Site icon the janus observer

September 9 – September 15, 2016

Advertisements

It appears there is no “too big to fail” in South Korea. US inflation coming only from a few unproductive sectors. China’s credit hose targeted at housing.

Headlines

Briefs

Special Reports / Opinion Pieces

Graphics

FT – Air pollution deaths cost global economy $5tn annually – Shawn Donnan 9/8

Bloomberg – San Francisco Housing Frenzy Shifts Across the Bay to Oakland – Alison Vekshin 8/22

WSJ – Paradise Lost: Why the Good Times Are Over for Global Bonds – Richard Barley 9/14

FT – Vantage to break famine for energy IPOs – Eric Platt and Ed Crooks 9/14

Featured

*Note: bold emphasis is mine, italic sections are from the articles.

Seoul signals tougher stance with Hanjin demise. Song Jung-a. Financial Times. 11 Sep. 2016.

“Hanjin’s move to seek bankruptcy protection last month was the first time a big container shipping line had done so for 30 years, and it caught out many in the industry. As recently as a couple of months ago, shipping executives considered the failure of Hanjin Shipping – the world’s seventh-largest container line and South Korea’s largest – unthinkable.”

“Hanjin Shipping and its rival Hyundai Merchant Marine handled the bulk of South Korea’s exports, which account for more than half of the country’s $1.4tn economy.”

“Until now, Seoul has spent decades keeping lossmaking companies afloat with cheap state loans. In the case of its embattled shipbuilders, it has injected billions of dollars, despite next to no progress in turning them around.”

“How Seoul ultimately handles Hanjin Shipping’s collapse will set the tone for future restructuring of Korea Inc.”

“Many of the country’s smokestack industries – including steel, chemicals and construction – are similarly suffering from overcapacity.”

“The government has set up the principle that it will no longer support ailing companies with taxpayers’ money just because they are too big.” – Yoo Il-ho, South Korea’s finance minister

Alphaville – Least productive sectors only thing keeping inflation going. Matthew C. Klein. Financial Times. 12 Sep. 2016.

Since 1990 “…the bulk of the growth in employment can be attributed to a few sectors where productivity is either low or unmeasurable, a whopping 88% of the total rise in the price level boils down to four sectors of the US economy.”

1) Healthcare services, 2) Housing, 3) Education, and 4) Prescription drugs

“In January 1990, those four product categories only accounted for 30% of the money spent on consumption by the average American.”

And within education the main culprit has been the textbook.  Akin to prescription drugs, supply in both industries is tightly controlled by regulation.

“By contrast, thanks to astounding technological innovation, television prices have plunged at an average rate of 12% each year since 1990 and computer prices have fallen more than 18% per year.”

“In general, the prices of durable goods are about a third lower now than in 1990, while the prices of nondurable goods excluding commodity products (food, drinks, and fuel, which tend to rise at the same rate as the broader price level over time) and excluding prescription drugs, have also fallen, albeit not by as much. Inflation outside of healthcare and education has generally been modest, with the notable exception of a few small professional services such as tax preparation, lawyers, and funeral homes.”

China’s Credit Fire Hose Floods Housing Market. Anjani Trivedi. Wall Street Journal. 15 Sep. 2016.

“More than 70% of new loans in August were to households, much of that in the form of mortgages, going by historical averages, a remarkable shifting of the fire hose of credit. It also helps explain why China’s property market has raced higher despite broader economic worries.”

“China’s stock of mortgages stood at 16.9 trillion yuan ($2.5 trillion) as of June 30. Almost a quarter of that was built up in just the past year, according to ANZ. Mortgage loans outstanding now account for 18% of total loans, the highest since at least 2008.”

“Local regulators are imposing clampdowns on mortgage lending and property speculation in the hottest cities such as Shanghai and Shenzhen. They are right to do so, as this leg of China’s multi-decade property bubble is clearly being fueled by leverage in a way that it wasn’t in the past.”

Other Interesting Articles

Bloomberg Businessweek

The Economist

Bloomberg – How Big Sugar Enlisted Harvard Scientist to Influence How We Eat – in 1965 9/12

Bloomberg – What’s Wrong With America’s Dream of City Living 9/14

Economist – Why does Thailand keep changing its constitution? 9/12

FT – When will the ECB run out of bonds to buy? 9/8

FT – China infrastructure investment model under fire 9/10

FT – Twitter and tech: hardly working 9/11

FT – What investors should know about R star 9/11

FT – Oil market braces for Kashagan field’s October debut 9/12

FT – The Swiss and negative rates: how is the experiment going? 9/12

FT – Philippines pivots away from the US 9/13

FT – Japan opens door to temporary foreign workers 9/13

FT – Manias make markets dance to a different tune 9/13

FT – Mythbusting Uber’s valuation 9/13

FT – China retail: shops will drop 9/14

Trepp – Non-Traded REITs on slowest capital-raising pace in 12 years 9/9

WSJ – Bank of Japan Has Enlarged Target in Corporate Bonds 9/12

Yahoo Finance – The internet is creating a demographic ‘seismic shift’ that is too big to ignore 9/12

Yahoo Finance – Billionaire Paul Singer warns of the ‘biggest bubble in the world’ 9/13

 

Exit mobile version