Site icon the janus observer

April 9, 2017

Advertisements

Perspective

Economist – Free exchange: How Chavez and Maduro have impoverished Venezuela 4/6

“It is hard to convey the severity of Venezuela’s unfolding crisis. Its extent is astounding: the economy shrank by 10% last year, and will be 23% smaller than in 2013 by the end of this year, according to IMF forecasts. Inflation may exceed 1,600% this year. The human details are more poignant: over the past year around three-quarters of Venezuelans have lost weight, averaging 8.7kg (19.18lbs) per person, because of a scarcity of food. No war, foreign or civil, is to blame for this catastrophe. Venezuela did this to itself.”

“Fifty years ago, Venezuela was an example to the rest of Latin America, a relatively stable democracy and not much poorer than Britain.”

“Venezuela’s economy is built on oil – its leaders boast it has the world’s largest proven reserves – and it is tempting blame fickle crude prices for its woes. Oil accounts for more than 90% of Venezuelan exports. It helps to fund the government budget and provides the foreign exchange that the country needs to import consumer goods. Nearly everything of consequence in the economy, from toilet paper to trousers, is imported from abroad.”

“As oil prices soared in the 2000s, Venezuela found itself awash in cash. In 2014 the boom ended.” So the new president, Nicolas Maduro, could either let the bolivar float and depreciate in a meaningful way causing imports to jump in price – likely a very unpopular move – or fix the exchange rate, cross his fingers and try to keep market distortions from becoming overwhelming. 

“Economic dependence on oil is always fraught. Soaring oil prices place upward pressure on the exchange rate, leaving other, non-oil industries at a competitive disadvantage. That deepens an oil-exporting economy’s dependence on crude, worsening the pain when prices eventually fall.”

So what to do?

“When times are good, some use inflows of hard currency to build up foreign-exchange reserves, which can be drawn down later to cover foreign-currency obligations and import bills; Saudi Arabia holds reserves worth more than $500bn, for example. Others use oil profits to fill sovereign-wealth funds, which invest in a diversified portfolio in order to reduce the economy’s long-run exposure to petroleum. Norway’s fund, which is intended to help pay for state pensions, is worth nearly $900bn.”

“Chavez had the good fortune to take office at the tail end of a two-decade swoon in oil prices, and to preside over a price surge. The money that came to Chavez, he spent. From 2000 to 2013, spending as a share of GDP rose from 28% to 40%: a much bigger rise than in Latin America’s other large economies. Spending crowded out growth in foreign-exchange reserves. In 2000 Venezuela had enough reserves to cover more than seven months of imports; that dropped to under three months by 2013 (over the same period Russia’s reserves grew from five months of import cover to ten, and Saudi Arabia’s from four months to 37).”

“Why did Chavez not leave Venezuela better prepared for the inevitable crash?… During his rule, Chavez increased public spending on social programs and expanded subsidies for food and energy. Venezuelans felt the results, in higher incomes and improved standards of living. Chavez delivered, for a time.”

“Yet this narrative was false… In his careless economic management, he undercut the oil wealth that funded Venezuelan socialism. His assaults on private firms left the country short of the expertise and capital needed to develop its resources. In recent years it has produced less oil than China and a quarter of the output of Saudi Arabia. Venezuela ate its seed corn despite record harvests.”

“Venezuela was once the envy of Latin America, until a long stagnation in living standards brought a populist strongman to power. But popularity is hard to maintain. The greater the desperation of the populist, the greater the willingness to accept long-run risks in exchange for short-run pay-offs. Whether or not the populists survives to see it, the day of reckoning eventually arrives. And it is always the people that suffer most.”

Markets / Economy

Bloomberg Businessweek – Lies, Damn Lies, and Financial Statistics – Peter Coy 4/6

Economist – Eyes bigger than their wallets: Consumers and firms see a Trump boom. Most forecasters do not 4/6

NYT – Boom or Bust: Stark Partisan Divide on How Consumers View Economy – Nelson Schwartz 4/8

Real Estate

Bloomberg Businessweek – Toronto Bidding Wars So Fierce Homebuyers Skip Inspections – Kim Chipman 4/3

Economist – Aparkalypse now: The perilous politics of parking 4/6

Finance

Economist – Consumer loans: Payday lending is declining 4/8

Environment

WSJ – Rainy Days Are Here Again: California Governor Declares Drought Over – Jim Carlton 4/7

NYT – Rising Waters Threaten China’s Rising Cities – Michael Kimmelman 4/7

Health / Medicine

Bloomberg Businessweek – Just How Much Is a Medical Miracle Worth? – Caroline Chen 4/6

China

Value Walk – China Debt Problem Is Massive At $35 Trillion, On Par With Greece – Mark Melin 4/8

Exit mobile version